home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: Howard.Gerber@f88.n106.z1.fidonet.org (Howard Gerber)
- Sender: Jpunix@urchin.fidonet.org
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!jpunix!urchin!Jpunix
- Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.soc
- Subject: Re: Cycling and Environmentalism
- Message-ID: <724911260.AA06258@urchin.fidonet.org>
- Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 21:46:06 -0500
- Lines: 144
-
- Ed Ravin tells all cyclists:
-
- ER> The real question is how John Forester and cycling
- environmentalists
- ER> disagree. Forester seems to see disagreements where none exist,
-
- Just because many environmentalists try to deny that they have any
- differences
- with cyclists does not meant that these differences do not exist. I've
- been to
- too many meetings in which environmentalists have with one breath told
- us how
- wonderful it was that we rode bicycles, and with another breath said
- something
- like, "of course we all agree that the only safe place to ride bicycles
- is on
- off-road trails."
-
- JF> I say that doing good for cyclists by making cycling safer, faster,
- more
- JF> convenient, with higher psychological rewards and with higher
- social status
- JF> is likely to increase the amount of cycling done and decrease the
- amount of
- JF> motoring done, which is a good effect.
-
- ER> Most bicycle advocates agree with this, especially about decreasing
- the
- ER> amount of motoring.
-
- Ah, but most environmentalists who advocate cycling, but don't do it
- themselves, don't hold the same position. Making cycling safer and
- faster
- are not on their agenda.
-
- ER> But when bicyclists actually begin to talk about how to reduce
- automobile
- ER> usage, Forester turns ugly. He has written articles and letters to
- Bicycle
- ER> USA claiming that bicycle advocates should not advocate against
- cars,
-
- Reducing automobile traffic by voluntary usage of bicycles is not the
- same
- thing as attacking the use or facilities for motorists.
-
- ER> Most bicycling advocacy organizations have a broad agenda -- they
- want some
- ER> bike paths here, better roads there, bike parking in some other
- places.
-
- I have been very actively pressuring such a "bicycling advocacy
- organization,"
- the Houston Mayor's Taskforce on Bicycle Mobility. Yes, they have a
- broad
- agenda for bike paths, bike parking and bicycle education, but not
- better
- roads. The prevailing view of most of the members with significant
- political
- authority is that the only thing that can be done for the road is to
- post
- "Bike Route" signs on any good roads that they can find. Millions of
- dollars
- are available for trail improvement, but somehow bicycles as
- transportation
- is not considered important.
-
- ER> They also want metropolitan transportation planning agencies to
- stop
- ER> promoting automobile transportation above all other options, and to
- stop
- ER> building roadway infrastructure that encourages automobiling to
- the
- ER> exclusion of anything else.
-
- Now I can see definite problems with an organization like that. I want
- better
- roads. I want roads that have wide outside lanes, so that motorists can
- safely
- pass bicyclists. I want intersection signals to work for bicyclists. I
- want
- to see the redesign of roads that force the right lane to turn right at
- every
- intersection. Most of my vision of better cycling includes better
- roads.
-
- ER> They're also concerned about land use issues and the spread of
- suburban
- ER> sprawl, which separates workplaces and homes so that non-automobile
- travel
- ER> becomes untenable.
-
- This is a rather irrelevent issue to many cyclists that I know. If you
- can
- find a job, even if you have to ride 30 miles to get there, you take
- it. I
- know I have. If we could somehow legislate prosperity, and could
- guarantee
- everyone a job within walking distance, now wouldn't that be nice? Get
- real!
-
- ER> I have yet to hear a single person from the bicycle advocacy
- movement say
- ER> that cyclists should be kicked off the roads and forced to use
- trails or
- ER> paths.
-
- We have a slightly different set of terminology. I consider myself to
- be a
- bicycle advocate, and I know others, like Michael Carr who do, too.
- However,
- we are not in the same camp as such organizations as G.H.A.S.P., who
- preach about how wonderful bicycling is, but of course they can't do
- it
- themselves.
-
- ER> Bicycle advocates in NY City, for example, have long complained
- about
- [lots of good things about real bicycle advocates deleted]
- ER> roadway development plans.
-
- ER> So why does Forester bash bicycle advocates?
-
- Forester is not upset about cycling organizations that advocate
- improvements
- for cyclists, he is concerned about that same groups that I'm upset
- about,
- groups that tell people to bicycle because it is good for the
- environment,
- good for the political situation, etc.
-
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- The bicycle's function as a means of transport is much more important
- than
- its use as a piece of sports equipment, a health device or a protest
- symbol
- for the ecologically minded.
- --Rob van der Plas, THE PENGUIN BICYCLE HANDBOOK
-
- __ o Howard Gerber Two Wheelers: 713-682-6508
- . . < \ . USENET: howard.gerber@urchin.fidonet.org
- : : > : : Fidonet: 1:106/88.0 PODNet: 93:9008/0.0
- ` ` ` ` Moderator of the Fidonet BIKENET echo
-
-