home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!xn.ll.mit.edu!xn!alexj
- From: alexj@juliet.ll.mit.edu ( Alexander Jackl )
- Subject: Re: Einstein and Warp Speed
- In-Reply-To: hinson@bohr.physics.purdue.edu's message of 16 Dec 92 09:08:03 GMT
- Message-ID: <ALEXJ.92Dec22173733@claudius.juliet.ll.mit.edu>
- Sender: usenet@xn.ll.mit.edu
- Organization: M.I.T. Lincoln Lab - Group 43
- References: <8918@dirac.physics.purdue.edu> <724455898snz@keris.demon.co.uk>
- <8950@dirac.physics.purdue.edu>
- Date: 22 Dec 92 17:37:33
- Lines: 32
-
-
- I just wanted to say one thing. Jay is absolutely correct in his
- continuous declaration that in our universe AS WE KNOW IT TO WORK NOW
- you cannot have FTL travel without a causality breakdown.
-
- HOWEVER- lest we all forget what Einstein did to the Newtonian universe-
- what he did was design a mathematical model, based on local evidence (local
- being defined as test measurements here on Earth and near Earth orbit and
- EM data from nearby stellar formations), to describe the universe.
-
- It is nothing more than that. Sometimes devotees of science forget the
- context that science works in. IT is absolutley untrue that FTL travel
- will ABSOLUTELY cause a causality breakdown- it will though ABSOLUTELY do
- so in the framework of the Theories of Relativity.
-
- We cannot know what is ahead- to think we really do know the basic facts
- of the universe is silly and a little strange. Imagine a goldfish deciding
- it knew what was so about the universe from direct experimentation and
- and visual evidence. Imagine then that that goldfish was born and bred in
- fish tank in someone's house. How accurate a view do you think the goldfish
- could have? If you think that analogy doesn't apply to us think about it
- a little and then think about the size of the universe compared to our
- immediate observable sphere. Pretty funny, huh?
-
- I also want to be clear that Jay is correct within the context of Relativity
- and current knowledge.
-
- That should do it! And Thanks for the physics fun, Jay!
-
- Alex
-
-
-