home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!netcomsv!cruzio!jjwebb
- From: jjwebb@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us
- Newsgroups: rec.arts.poems
- Subject: quibbles and a poem ...
- Summary: quibbles
- Keywords: pontificating
- Message-ID: <4803@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 92 16:17:32 PST
- References: <4794@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us> <1992Dec20.173222.19536@news.cs.indiana.edu>
- Sender: jjwebb@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us
- Reply-To: jjwebb@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us
- Lines: 129
-
-
-
-
- A few quibbles about Marek's response to my comment on his comments.
- He continues (look out I'm gonna say it again marek) pontificating:
-
- > [JJ] misuses the word "pontificates" and commits other misdemeanors:
-
- So you won't admit to even a smidgen of pompousity in your reply to
- keymaster and your evaluation of the poem? How interesting ...
-
- BTW, if I've 'misused' pontificating then you've misused 'misdemeanors'
- and we can quibble over license and shading til the resurrection of Poe ...
-
- > I certainly did not imply that my contributions to rap are artless
- > in comparison to "Ode". Thanks for allowing me to make this explicit. :)
-
- You're welcome ... I find it a bit disingenuous though, that you'd
- only cite YOUR work as the artfull 'love' contributions to compare
- to "Ode .." on RAP. It lacks generosity and borders on self inflation.
- Ah, what a wonderful thing, the ego ...
-
- > Do you alledge that [2live Crew] are undercover fund-raisers for NOW or
- > something?
-
- I allege that they are propagandists ... only slightly entertaining
- (and only to a mob desensitized to misery) and completely devoid of
- art. Blunt ... does not equal honest ...
-
- > One of these days I will produce a list on rap that starts with -8 and see
- > if anyone complains.
-
- I wasn't complaining ... just asking if you were being subtle ...
-
- > Why is the poem not honest?
-
- It lacks honesty in that it pretends to, but so obviously does not, care ...
- Now maybe the lack of humanity in the main character (I) is what is most
- important to the author. If so, I've missed the boat again .. a
- common occurrence .. but then the question becomes "should the
- audience care for a work with no redeeming features or characters?"
- (this is much of my complaint with Bukowski (2live Crew as well))
-
- > There is no accounting for tastes. Vivid to me.
-
- point noted ... individualism is important ...
-
- > It's a lovely statement. Think of it as the sacrament thingee in a mass.
-
- No! YOU think of it that way ... I'll think of it as a superfluous
- statement when viewed in this context.
-
- > You wouldn't want to go around editing liturgy, would you? I'd hate to
- > see what you would do with Sunday service...
-
- This debating tactic is unbecoming ... you can do better ...
-
- > I am growing in my conviction (sort of like in facial hair) that you guys
- > out there JUST DON'T GET IT.
-
- I'll make a deal with you ... you protect my individualism and I'll
- do the same for you ... "YOU GUYS" is a foul seasoning that I had given you
- credit, in the past, for being intelligent enough not to salt your
- offerings with ... pray let's not start now.
-
- > Tenderness is a matter of mystery achievement.
-
- This, in my estimation, is an example of pontificating ...
-
- > You need to work very hard, say your mantras, and see more and more in the
- > world around you, with a quickening eye, to see more and more tenderness.
-
- And this as well ... got your certificate of tenderness from
- Tassajaran Monks did you? Monastic life and computer science, now
- there's a combo that's going to produce tender mercies for you.
-
- > This poem is tender. But I can't make you see it.
-
- And you can't explain it to me either, except with mantras and
- mysticism ... which makes the statement suspect ... in the extreme.
- "Have faith chillens, I have TALKED to god!"
- "Yeah, right, whatever you say preacher ... now, how much is
- this 'Virgin Mary' Hoola Hoop?"
-
- > Your putdown of Bukowski is yours to exercise, nonetheless it throws me for
- > a loop, because I thought we agreed on important things. :) That's ok,
- > I'll live.
-
- So Bukowski's important to you? Why? Rather, what is it about his work
- that would make you recommend him? Or make you think that my
- disliking him was a disagreement with you on 'important things'?
-
-
- JJWebb
-
- another poem?
-
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
- 1971
-
- On my journey north through Bedlam Boro
- I thought I saw an eagle.
- But he was up there pretty high ...
- I mean,
- He could have been a crow.
- And as I watched him watching me
- He flew
- In ever widening circles.
- I got the feeling that he knew
- Something important that I didn't know,
- And so I asked him,
- "Bird!"
- (It seems I'm always shouting upward)
- "Bird,
- Can you tell me anything fantastic?"
- Now it may have been,
- A convoluted wind,
- But
- (and I know this sounds a little drastic)
- I could have sworn I heard him answer,
- "No ... "
-
-
- from "Appalachian Canticles" by JJWebb
- A Jarus Book, copyright (c) 1979
-
- --
-
-