home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU!CSD-NewsHost!jmc
- From: jmc@SAIL.Stanford.EDU (John McCarthy)
- Subject: Re: Celebrating McGonagall
- In-Reply-To: twain@milton.u.washington.edu's message of 3 Jan 1993 00:42:15 GMT
- Message-ID: <JMC.93Jan2184022@SAIL.Stanford.EDU>
- Sender: news@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU
- Reply-To: jmc@cs.Stanford.EDU
- Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University
- References: <31DEC92.18501965@vax.clarku.edu> <9932npr@rpi.edu>
- <1993Jan2.224613.12367@psych.toronto.edu>
- <1i5cp7INN54r@shelley.u.washington.edu>
- Date: 2 Jan 93 18:40:22
- Lines: 16
-
- Certain aspects of McGonagall's verse are bad, his meter, his rhymes
- and his use of cliches. I think there is something left that is
- pretty good, but I can't put my finger on it. This accounts for
- people reading a McGonagall opus to the end.
-
- Test: take a work by McGonagall, choose 3 stanzas at random and try
- replace them by your best McGonagall imitation. Then see if you can
- fool the McGonagall connoisseurs about which is the fake McGonagall
- and which is the real thing. If the poetry is purely and simply bad,
- this should be easy.
-
- --
- John McCarthy, Computer Science Department, Stanford, CA 94305
- *
- He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
-
-