home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky news.groups:24790 sci.med:22921
- Newsgroups: news.groups,sci.med
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!europa.asd.contel.com!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!data.nas.nasa.gov!eos!kronos.arc.nasa.gov!pluto.arc.nasa.gov!kpc
- From: kpc@pluto.arc.nasa.gov (k p c)
- Subject: Re: RFD: sci.med.psychiatry
- In-Reply-To: eepee@polaris.utu.fi's message of Tue, 15 Dec 92 15:30:28 GMT
- Message-ID: <KPC.92Dec20183236@zog.arc.nasa.gov>
- Originator: kpc@zog.arc.nasa.gov
- Lines: 10
- Sender: usenet@kronos.arc.nasa.gov (Will Edgington, wedgingt@ptolemy.arc.nasa.gov)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: zog.arc.nasa.gov
- Reply-To: kpc@ptolemy.arc.nasa.gov
- Organization: NASA Ames Research Center AI Research and Aero Branches;
- Sterling.
- References: <1992Dec15.040115.23060@u.washington.edu>
- <1992Dec15.153028.11076@polaris.utu.fi>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 02:32:15 GMT
-
- there is a bionet.neuroscience for neuro research, an alt.support for
- support, a sci.psychology for cognitive and apparently pseudoclinical
- psychology, cogneuro for cogneuro, and alt.psychoactives for
- psychopharmacology. why would we want sci.med.psychiatry?
-
- i do think we need a group to discuss brain and mind with a clinical
- slant. i recommend sci.med.brain to encompass psychopharmacology etc.
- in general without excluding the valuable contributions of clinical
- neuro people. (alt.psychoactives has too many alt.drugs type posts
- and doesn't cover discussions of brain imaging, etc.)
- --
- i'm open to comparing research career notes with other young cogsci people.
-