home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.legal.computing
- Path: sparky!uunet!psgrain!qiclab!leonard
- From: leonard@qiclab.scn.rain.com (Leonard Erickson)
- Subject: Re: Question => Second hand software
- Message-ID: <1992Dec25.115018.17701@qiclab.scn.rain.com>
- Reply-To: Leonard.Erickson@f51.n105.z1.fidonet.org
- Organization: SCN Research/Qic Laboratories of Tigard, Oregon.
- References: <1992Dec8.012144.23129@cirrus.com> <18BN02b32eUH01@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com> <bhayden.723912529@teal> <1992Dec10.045327.16364@panix.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 11:50:18 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- oppedahl@panix.com (Carl Oppedahl) writes:
-
- >I thought there was a shrink-wrap case in Louisiana a few years
- >ago ...
-
- Yes, but Louisiana is a special case. They have a state law that
- *explicitly* states that "shrink wrap" licenses are valid. The various
- software publishers haven'y managed to talk any other states into
- doing that.
-
-
- --
- Leonard Erickson leonard@qiclab.scn.rain.com
- CIS: [70465,203] 70465.203@compuserve.com
- FIDO: 1:105/51 Leonard.Erickson@f51.n105.z1.fidonet.org
- (The CIS & Fido addresses are preferred)
-