home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!agate!boulder!tramp.Colorado.EDU!gordon
- From: gordon@tramp.Colorado.EDU (GORDON ALLEN R)
- Subject: Re: War cry of the scientific
- Message-ID: <gordon.725214602@tramp.Colorado.EDU>
- Sender: news@colorado.edu (The Daily Planet)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: tramp.colorado.edu
- Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
- References: <1han6gINN4uf@grapevine.EBay.Sun.COM> <schumach.725153887@convex.convex.com> <1992Dec24.010448.24145@news.mentorg.com>
- Date: 24 Dec 92 16:30:02 GMT
- Lines: 31
-
- madhavn@madhavn.mentorg.com (Madhav Nerurkar) writes:
-
-
- >Is there a simple decisive test in modern medicine that will determine if
- >a given alternative theory has some merits ?
-
- I don't think so. We can't even be sure in many cases, that an allopathic
- treatment will work, eg., surgery and/or radiation and/or chemotherapy for
- some types of cancer.
-
- >There can be significant lag, even of lifetimes, between empirical
- >observations and an understanding of the underlying mechanisms. Without a
- >test won't we either run the risk of passing up on real opprtunities or
- >run the risk of taken in by a scam.
-
- There are many scams in both the alternative modalities as well as the currentlyaccepted modality.
-
- >If in fact such a test exists, is it applied to inventions in modern
- >medicines or is it basically the prestige of the institutions that decides
- >the outcome ?
-
- I want to play rabbi here and answer a question with a question. When an
- epidemiologist says that 50,000 people will `catch` the current flu virus, is
- he/she making a prediction or rather because a professional in authority is
- making an edict, will people comply by getting the flu?
-
- --
- Allen Gordon *If the folly of but one of us was changed to*
- Research Associate *intelligence, and divided amongst a thousand*
- gordon@tramp.colorado.edu *toads, each would be more intelligent than *
- *Aristotle *
-