home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!cent.rprc.washington.edu!cent
- From: cent@u.washington.edu (Bob Cent)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
- Subject: cx: 32-bit clean?
- Message-ID: <1i01rsINNer2@shelley.u.washington.edu>
- Date: 1 Jan 93 00:05:16 GMT
- Article-I.D.: shelley.1i01rsINNer2
- Distribution: world
- Organization: University of Washington
- Lines: 15
- NNTP-Posting-Host: cent.rprc.washington.edu
- X-UserAgent: Nuntius v1.1.1d12
- X-XXMessage-ID: <A768CBC8BB010B23@cent.rprc.washington.edu>
- X-XXDate: Thu, 31 Dec 92 16:09:44 GMT
-
- Some time ago I remember that Mac users were quite upset that not all the
- Mac II computers were using true 32-bit addressing (maybe just the cx).
- In fact, people were pressuring Apple to issue new ROMs to rectify the
- matter.
-
- Does anyone remember what this was all about and why don't we hear about
- it anymore?
-
- I am inquiring because it has been mentioned that I should be compiling
- new Think Pascal/MacApp applications in 32-bit mode (?). Please fill me
- in if you are aware of this because it is news to me.
-
- Bob Cent (cent@u.washington.edu)
- University of Washington, SJ-50
- Seattle, WA 98195
-