home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
- Path: sparky!uunet!ferkel.ucsb.edu!taco!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!mojo.eng.umd.edu!russotto
- From: russotto@eng.umd.edu (Matthew T. Russotto)
- Subject: Re: P5 v. PowerPC (WAS: Where the mac really wins)
- Message-ID: <1992Dec27.175111.15939@eng.umd.edu>
- Date: Sun, 27 Dec 92 17:51:11 GMT
- Organization: Project GLUE, University of Maryland, College Park
- References: <D2150035.lqbfh6@outpost.SF-Bay.org> <1992Dec26.230858.4892@netcom.com>
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <1992Dec26.230858.4892@netcom.com> parag@netcom.com (Parag Patel) writes:
- >
- >I believe that the PowerPC is like the MIPS, in that it can handle
- >either endian-ness, but if it can't, I'll bet it's big-endian.
- >Unfortunately, while most modern chips can go either way, the software
- >which runs upon it usually doesn't. Sad, but system software generally
- >has to make such assumptions to run fast (networking code, drivers, etc.)
-
- I don't know about the PowerPC, but the RS6000s are big-endian.
- There's a load and store byte-reversed instruction, but that's about
- the only concession to other 'endianness'.
-
- --
- Matthew T. Russotto russotto@eng.umd.edu russotto@wam.umd.edu
- Some news readers expect "Disclaimer:" here.
- Just say NO to police searches and seizures. Make them use force.
- (not responsible for bodily harm resulting from following above advice)
-