home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!johnwu
- From: johnwu@netcom.com (John M. Wu)
- Subject: Re: Conner 170 meg drives any good?
- Message-ID: <1993Jan3.035203.24327@netcom.com>
- Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
- References: <7227@ucsbcsl.ucsb.edu>
- Distribution: comp
- Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 03:52:03 GMT
- Lines: 26
-
- In article <7227@ucsbcsl.ucsb.edu> 6500boo@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu (William Bushing) writes:
- >I was looking at the Maxtor 7213A as the my next hard drive in
- >a new system. The Conner 170 meg is now being offered instead
- >by my vendor. Any comments on this drive, especially in comparison
- >to the Maxtor? thanks in advance.
-
- I asked the readers of comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware for opinions on the 213 meg
- Maxtor drive yesterday. I also asked for a score from -10 to +10 for the drive.
-
- Again, I request Maxtor owners esp. the 7213A to mail me a short opinion on the
- drive with a score of -10 to +10 where
-
- -10 = garbage
- 0 = functional (loses files, crashed once but works)
- +10 = great!
-
- Owners of other Maxtors are welcome in this survey. Just let me know what
- model it is.
-
- I will post a summary and tabulate the results in a few days.
-
- --
- John M. Wu "And if a double decker bus, crashes into us
- johnwu@netcom.com to die by your side, is such a heavenly way to die"
- jmw@ocf.berkeley.edu - There Is A Light That Never Goes Out
- #include <flameprotect.h>
-