home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!europa.asd.contel.com!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!silver.ucs.indiana.edu!ntaib
- From: ntaib@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Iskandar Taib)
- Subject: Re: Why hasn't IBM run away with the 486?
- Message-ID: <BzME5H.FpD@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
- Sender: news@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: silver.ucs.indiana.edu
- Organization: Indiana University
- References: <1992Dec6.072821.29426@julian.uwo.ca> <ByuI7B.6E9@utdallas.edu>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 17:34:28 GMT
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <ByuI7B.6E9@utdallas.edu> goyal@utdallas.edu (MOHIT K GOYAL) writes:
-
- >I'm not sure what your point is. IBM has never been a "clone-basher" until
- >just recently.(their PS/ValuePoint line). Of course, everyone else is a
- >clone-basher too.(Dell, Compaq, DEC)
-
- Thats what the Model 30 was _supposed_ to be.
-
- Didn't say they were good at it though 9-)
-
-
-
- --
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Iskandar Taib | The only thing worse than Peach ala
- Internet: NTAIB@SILVER.UCS.INDIANA.EDU | Frog is Frog ala Peach
- Bitnet: NTAIB@IUBACS !
-