home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games
- Path: sparky!uunet!ulowell!woods.ulowell.edu!stancad
- From: stancad@woods.ulowell.edu
- Subject: Re: I pirated StarControlII
- Message-ID: <1992Dec21.224716.1@woods.ulowell.edu>
- Lines: 32
- Sender: usenet@ulowell.ulowell.edu (News manager - ulowell)
- Organization: University of Lowell
- References: <dpn2.192.724187458@po.CWRU.Edu> <1992Dec13.004045.17350@netcom.com> <1992Dec13.065730.18720@u.washington.edu>
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 03:47:16 GMT
-
- In article <1992Dec13.065730.18720@u.washington.edu>, robs@hardy.u.washington.edu (Robert Suh) writes:
- > In article <1992Dec13.004045.17350@netcom.com> primus@netcom.com (Robert keng) writes:
- >>dpn2@po.CWRU.Edu (Damien P. Neil) writes:
- >>: >>O.K. fine. You've made it clear that you're a loser. So now what?
- >>: >>We're supposed to jump through hoops for you?
- >>: >>
- >>: >>Get a clue.
- >>: >
- >>: >Gee Ros...'Loser' is such a subjective term. While I think your mag is great...
- >>: >What exactl do you get out of it monetary wise, or any wise?? Surely
- >>: >anyone who spends all of that time just to get a warm fuzzy PD feeling could be called a 'Loser'...? No??
- >>:
- >
- > Actually, someone like Ross, who does a great service to a segment of the
- > human population, seems to be a rare (and refreshing) exception to the rule.
- > Obviously, someone who should be (and probably is...) thanked more often.
- >
- > Anyways, your statement shows that you have very limited understanding of
- > society, in which, I hope you learn something in the .edu you attend.
- >
- > P.S. I'd consider you a loser, but that's to subjective. Actually, I'd think
- > 'idiot' is more appropriate.
- >
- > - Rob
-
-
- Why would anyone bother to reply to this moron? By the way, great job Ross!
- (Who is he? What does he do? Who cares!)
-
- Scorpion
-
-
-