home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!gatech!concert!sas!mozart.unx.sas.com!walker
- From: walker@twix.unx.sas.com (Doug Walker)
- Subject: Re: Advice to SAS/C 5.10b users
- Originator: walker@twix.unx.sas.com
- Sender: news@unx.sas.com (Noter of Newsworthy Events)
- Message-ID: <C01BGv.An5@unx.sas.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 19:00:31 GMT
- References: <BzroCE.MHH@unx.sas.com> <paulk.2xo6@terapin.com>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: twix.unx.sas.com
- Organization: SAS Institute Inc.
- Lines: 21
-
-
- In article <paulk.2xo6@terapin.com>, paulk@terapin.com (Paul Kienitz) writes:
- |> > We'll get right on it. It's obviously a bug in the biffing
- |> > algorithm, or possibly the peephole optibiffer.
- |>
- |> That was one reason I originally went with Aztec -- because of its
- |> far more reliable biffing features.
-
- Yes, but they can't touch our performance on biffered I/O.
-
- HAHAHAHA oops, sorry. Getting a little punchy.
-
- --
- *****
- =*|_o_o|\\=====Doug Walker, Software Distiller====== BBS: (919)460-7430 =
- *|. o.| || 1200/2400/9600 Dual
- | o |// For all you do, this bug's for you!
- ======
- usenet: walker@unx.sas.com bix: djwalker
- Any opinions expressed are mine, not those of SAS Institute, Inc.
-
-