home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Path: sparky!uunet!psgrain!m2xenix!agora!robart
- From: robart@agora.rain.com (Joe Bob)
- Subject: Re: Attn Commodore: You are making a Big Mistake (Hardware
- Message-ID: <BztsAz.DEt@agora.rain.com>
- Organization: a gora
- References: <Jesse_Michael.02qs@matrix.rain.com> <1992Dec21.102751.9671@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de>
- Distribution: world
- Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 17:23:22 GMT
- Lines: 15
-
- In article <1992Dec21.102751.9671@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de> mlelstv@specklec.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de (Michael van Elst) writes:
- >In <Jesse_Michael.02qs@matrix.rain.com> Jesse_Michael@matrix.rain.com (Jesse Michael) writes:
- >>In case you didn't notice, in the Hardware Reference Manuals the C=
- >>released before *the examples used absolute addressing*.
- >
- >Well, there's nothing wrong about absolute addressing. Every C compiler
- >generates absolute addressing as well. But of course the linker generates
- >a relocation table that enables LoadSeg() to load the program to arbitrary
- >addresses.
-
- True, but that's not what he's talking about here. Absolute addresses
- like AbsExecBase or custom.bltcon0 certainly don't get relocated.
-
-
-
-