home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.sys.amiga.programmer:17771 comp.sys.amiga.hardware:22033
- Path: sparky!uunet!cbmvax!andy
- From: andy@cbmvax.commodore.com (Andy Finkel)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer,comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Subject: Re: Attn Commodore: You are making a Big Mistake (Hardware
- Message-ID: <38130@cbmvax.commodore.com>
- Date: 24 Dec 92 05:42:42 GMT
- References: <38039@cbmvax.commodore.com> <38m5VB4w165w@lakes.trenton.sc.us> <38111@cbmvax.commodore.com> <BzqqyC.M1o@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca>
- Reply-To: andy@cbmvax.commodore.com (Andy Finkel)
- Organization: Flying Cat, Inc.
- Lines: 63
-
- In article <BzqqyC.M1o@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca> engb@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca (Ben Eng) writes:
- >So why doesn't the Amiga have an OS friendly method of copy
- >protection? Give every Amiga a unique serial number implemented
- >in hardware. Just like every workstation has a unique hostid.
- >That would allow software vendors to provide software that is
- >tied to that hostid or multiple hostids.
-
- There were a couple of reasons. When I was at C= I advocated this
- strongly; I was not able to justify the cost of the extra PAL
- to top management on an A500 class machine.
-
- The other reason is that the unique ID protection method is
- much too easy to break; very few software companies would depend
- on that alone. (They've learned from Workstation experiences). Unless
- your machines are on the ethernet, and you use net addresses (and
- broadcast them :-) ) the ID is just too easy to fool.
-
- >Some people complain that this prevents them from chucking their
- >hardware and moving their software to a newer machine, but I have
- >found that the turnaround time that is necessary to obtain a brand
- >new license key from every Unix software vendors that I have dealt
- >with has been less than half an hour, especially if you have a FAX
- >machine.
-
- Prices in the Unix software market more easily support such an effort
- on the part of a 3rd party software vendor. That kind of software
- organization doesn't come free. Its got to be paid for somewhere.
-
- >For legitimate owners of commercial software there should not be
- >much resistance to this type of copy protection. It sure beats
- >being chained to your floppy disks or a funny decoder wheel, or
- >a piece of paper with strange symbols, or a book full of phrases
- >that need to be typed in at the start of every session. Of course,
-
- >it is not foolproof, but nothing is. It is effective though.
-
- It's a lot more effective where software is sold at a high price,
- with fancy license and use agreements, and where the end user is
- a business or corporation which generally doesn't want to be in
- the business of pirating software. There's just not as much incentive.
-
- >The only problem is that for Commodore to do so would offend the
- >target market and it would hurt their hardware sales. Since they
- >are not really in the software business their political powers
- >that be can't really be expected to care about that benefit it
- >could bring to their third party software vendors.
- >
- >Ben
-
-
- Hmm. If you believe this, you've got to believe it of every computer
- company that makes personal computers; Commodore, IBM, Apple, Dell,
- and so on. That's quite a conspiracy.
-
-
- andy
- --
- andy finkel andy@cbmvax.commodore.com
-
- "Unix is the Operating System of the future, and always will be."
-
- Any expressed opinions are mine; but feel free to share.
- I disclaim all responsibilities, all shapes, all sizes, all colors.
-