home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!caen!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!netcomsv!terapin!paulk
- From: paulk@terapin.com (Paul Kienitz)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: App(Icon|Window) and Style Guide.
- References: <1h3kutINN55t@uwm.edu>
- Message-ID: <paulk.2woe@terapin.com>
- Date: 23 Dec 92 10:42:28 PST
- Organization: BBS
- Lines: 11
-
- > I agree, lets standardize the drop system by making AppIcons and
- > AppWindows have the "lip". More importantly, if, someday, C=
- > decides to make an icon type (when .info files are no more, and
- > everybody uses 2.0 std. functions for accessing them) that allows
- > "dropping" onto them (The WB's copy function would simply examine
- > the icon's type, and if it was of type STD_DropApp, do whatever),
- > that icon could have a lip too.
-
- I strongly agree! Tool icons and AppIcons should ideally behave the
- same and should be visually distinct from project/drawer/etc icons.
- I don't care what the visual distinction is as long as it exists.
-