home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!navajo!shulick
- From: shulick@navajo.ucs.indiana.edu (Sam Hulick)
- Subject: SAS/C 5.10b bug discovered - Thanks, John
- Message-ID: <BzMuqG.D39@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
- Originator: shulick@navajo
- Sender: news@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: navajo.ucs.indiana.edu
- Reply-To: shulick@navajo.ucs.indiana.edu
- Organization: Vallen Software
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 23:32:40 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
-
- Ok, John, this seems to be a bug in 5.10b.
-
- #undef <symbol>
-
- This is fine, but 5.10b doesn't check the syntax fully. In 5.10b, no
- complaints are made about this:
-
- #undef FOOBAR "spaz"
-
- However, this same line would give you a warning in 6.0/6.1, saying that
- there are extra characters of the symbol, etc. The error was something
- like that.
-
- From my C experience, it's just #undef <symbol>, nothing more. Maybe
- UNIX C is bit different, I don't know. All I know is that 5.10b keeps
- quiet, 6.0/6.1 warn you.
-
- --
- // Amiga 3000 ___ \ Sam Hulick: shulick@indiana.edu (NeXTmail OK!)
- // 68030 25 MHz /__/\ \ My opinions wear combat boots. Or whatever.
- \\// OS 2.04 \__\/ / "Walk! Not bloody likely. I am going in a
- \/ / taxi." --George Bernard Shaw
-