home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!xenitec!lemsys!clemon
- From: clemon@lemsys.UUCP (Craig Lemon VE3XCL)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
- Subject: Re: max throughput amiga UUCP <-> SCO Xenix UUCP
- Message-ID: <fBles*m50@lemsys.UUCP>
- Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1993 13:27:43 EST
- References: <1992Dec31.010705.19588@tdkcs.waterloo.on.ca> <ajDds*F00@bkhouse.cts.com>
- Organization: Private UUCP "Twig" Node
- X-Newsreader: Arn V1.00
- Lines: 29
-
- In article <ajDds*F00@bkhouse.cts.com>, Norman Kraft writes:
-
- > In article <1992Dec31.010705.19588@tdkcs.waterloo.on.ca>, Tim Kuehn writes:
- >
- > >
- > > I'm running an SCO Xenix site which sends news and mail to a couple
- > > of Amiga UUCP sites over v.32bis modems. If I monitor the line when the
- > > Amiga site calls in, it shows a "Carrier 14400" and "Protocol ALT" when
- > > they make their connection, however, for some reason the transfer rate
- > > is only around 650cps, not the > 1000cps I would normally expect -and get-
- > > with another (non-Amiga) site over the same modem.
- > >
- > > Does anyone else out there have a similar setup and could render some advice?
- >
- > This is a problem I had as well, until I figured out that my modem setup
- > enabled both v.32bis *and* v.42 on those high-speed connects. Be sure that
- > you have v.42 disabled on these calls, and that the connection is pure
- > v.32bis. My cps rate went from 575 to 1050 (as given by xstat) with v.42
- > disabled.
-
- What kind of modem is this? V.42 and v.42bis are designed to never
- hinder connection speed. Unless, of course, the problem lay solely in link
- latency for the g protocol turnaround (?)
-
- --
- Craig Lemon VE3XCL (Advanced) - Kitchener, Ontario. +1 519 741 0297
- clemon@lemsys.UUCP clemon%lemsys@xenitec.on.ca | 1B Electrical Engineering
- TCP/IP: ve3xcl@ve3xcl.ampr.org [44.135.84.51] | University of Waterloo
- AX.25 Packet: ve3xcl@ve3euk.#SWON.ON.CAN.NA | Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
-