home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.os.os2.advocacy:11245 comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy:3556
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!caen!news.cs.indiana.edu!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!ecn.purdue.edu!helz
- From: helz@ecn.purdue.edu (Randall A Helzerman)
- Subject: Re: Is Microsoft the next Standard Oil?
- Message-ID: <1992Dec31.032124.1762@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>
- Sender: news@noose.ecn.purdue.edu (USENET news)
- Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
- References: <1992Dec29.194407.13490@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> <1hqe98INNsef@tamsun.tamu.edu> <1992Dec29.225839.15668@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> <1hsujcINNjrq@tamsun.tamu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 03:21:24 GMT
- Lines: 11
-
- In article <1hsujcINNjrq@tamsun.tamu.edu>, bdubbs@cs.tamu.edu (Bruce Dubbs) writes:
-
- |> |With OS/2 and NeXTSTEP (both of which can run DOS _and_ Windows programs)
- |> |Solaris, and Pink, I don't think Microsoft has faced as many competitors
- |> |in its history.
- |>
- |> Agreed. Thats why MS wants to go back to the bad old days.
-
- So basically Microsoft is being forced into lower prices because of
- competition in the marketplace. Things are working as they should.
-
-