home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.os.os2.advocacy:11131 comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy:3524
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sgiblab!news.cs.indiana.edu!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!ecn.purdue.edu!helz
- From: helz@ecn.purdue.edu (Randall A Helzerman)
- Subject: Re: FCC will proclaim Microsoft is run by Communists! : )
- Message-ID: <1992Dec29.233217.16168@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>
- Sender: news@noose.ecn.purdue.edu (USENET news)
- Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
- References: <BzLMIH.II3@csulb.edu> <1992Dec21.145115.25441@tc.cornell.edu> <Bzn0EI.D2w@csulb.edu> <1992Dec22.040237.14440@tc.cornell.edu> <wiegand.725655487@lido16>
- Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 23:32:17 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <wiegand.725655487@lido16>, wiegand@rtsg.mot.com (Robert Wiegand) writes:
-
- |> >If MS is capable of keeping prices down for the customer, why
- |> >should _they_ be penalized and not the less efficient companies ?
- |>
- |> Oh please - you can't really believe Microsoft would be selling their
- |> software cleaply if there was no competition.
-
- Competition is _exactly_ why they are selling so cheap. That's why
- for the life of me I can't understand why the low prices are being
- called "anticompetative."
-
- |> Microsoft - like any other
- |> company - will charge as much as they can for their products. If you
- |> eliminate their competitors their prices would go up *fast*.
-
- Sure they would--and competitors would reemerge just as fast. Sure I know
- that operating systems are big complex pieces of software and that it takes
- time to write them but it would happen and businesses would simply move
- to the Mac or to RISC workstations.
-