home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!concert!uvaarpa!murdoch!brain.med.virginia.edu!prs9k
- From: prs9k@brain.med.virginia.edu (Phil Scarr)
- Subject: Re: OS/2 bigot meets NT....
- Message-ID: <1992Dec25.155218.19143@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
- Organization: Neuroclinical Trials Center, University of Virginia
- References: <1992Dec24.033418.28702@wam.umd.edu> <725210115snx@montage.UUCP> <1992Dec25.142615.3337@wam.umd.edu>
- Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 15:52:18 GMT
- Lines: 34
-
- In article <1992Dec25.142615.3337@wam.umd.edu> rsrodger@wam.umd.edu (Yamanari) writes:
- >In article <725210115snx@montage.UUCP> platinum@montage.UUCP (Doug Swallow) writes:
- >>rsrodger@wam.umd.edu writes in article <1992Dec24.033418.28702@wam.umd.edu>:
- >>>
- >>> In article <1992Dec24.035348.26595@actrix.gen.nz> Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz writes:
- >>> >the 125 meg drive. I have 8 megs of 70ns RAM and the system runs very much
- >>> >like OS/2 on 4 megs with no HPFS.
- >>>
- >>>
- >>> As it should. 8 megs is the NT minimum.
- >>>
- >>> Plus, you *should expect crashes*. Installing any OS,
- >>> NT or OS/2, is not the same as just plugging in an HD
- >>> with the os installed. It must be configured for your hardware
- >>> and your motherboard.
- >> ^^^^^^^^^^^
- >>
- >>You're the one who's FUDding now.
- >
- >
- > Nope. He has said himself that there is a big difference
- > between his machine and his friends: he has 1/2 the memory.
-
- Bzzzzt! Thanks anyway. He said he installed it on a machine with the
- same memory, but more memory was added later.
-
- -Phil
- --
- PHIL SCARR \ We are Microsoft... / (o) 804.243.0229
- University of / OS/2 is irrelevant. \ (f) 804.243.0290
- Virginia, \ UNIX is irrelevant. / prs9k@Virginia.EDU
- Neurosurgery / Openness is futile. \ prs9k@Virginia.BITNET
- HP-UX is my life!\ Prepare to be assimilated... / ...uunet!virginia!prs9k
-
-