home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!hellgate.utah.edu!csn!tware!bash
- From: bash@tware.com (Paul Bash)
- Subject: Re: The Bottom Line
- Message-ID: <1992Dec23.175139.1062@tware.com>
- Organization: Techware Design, Boulder, Colorado
- References: <1992Dec7.221516.25600@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <1992Dec9.165948.21324@mksol.dseg.ti.com> <1992Dec9.230912.1065@fcom.cc.utah.edu>
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 17:51:39 GMT
- Lines: 14
-
- In article <1992Dec9.230912.1065@fcom.cc.utah.edu> brian@jaguar.cs.utah.edu (Brian Sturgill) writes:
- >
- >Are you just slow, or just very stubborn? The reason NFS is included in
- >the OS/2 resource usage is because without it OS/2 doesn't have peer-to-peer
- >networking.
- >
- >Brian
-
- Excuse, me. NFS has nothing to do with OS/2 peer to peer networking. TCP/IP
- provides that capability. NFS is just piled on top of it.
-
- --
- Paul Bash Techware Design
- bash@tware.com Boulder, CO U.S.A.
-