home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!meaddata!johnh
- From: johnh@meaddata.com (John Holt)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
- Subject: Re: ftc and ms
- Date: 23 Dec 1992 15:03:53 GMT
- Organization: Mead Data Central, Dayton OH
- Lines: 34
- Distribution: usa
- Message-ID: <1h9v4qINN607@meaddata.meaddata.com>
- References: <1992Dec22.045145.15784@tc.cornell.edu> <BzoA3B.M18@csfb1.fir.fbc.com> <1992Dec22.200742.28629@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: pleiad.meaddata.com
-
- In article <1992Dec22.200742.28629@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> helz@ecn.purdue.edu (Randall A Helzerman) writes:
- >In all of history (before or after the antitrust laws, or in a country
- >today which doesn't have anti-trust laws) which became a monopoly?
- >
- >The only monopolies I can think of are things like the post office,
- >utilites, etc which are illegal to compete against. Really, the free
- >market system is highly intolerant of big behemothic companies, especially
-
- I would like to direct your attention to the 1890's and in particular the
- rail and steel trusts.
-
- At the time, the rail monopolies dominated transportation and actually set the
- price a farmer could get for his goods at the market, and set the price that
- the distributor paid for those goods. While the grange movement was somewhat
- successful, it took the actions of the federal government to break the rail
- trust.
-
- The story of the steel trusts is similar.
-
- I believe your point concerning large behemothic companies is correct in times
- of great and rapid change. These organizations spend a great deal of energy
- to "manage" change.
-
- It is for the courts to decide re: MS. It is possible for an organization
- to restrain trade and generally be anti-competitive.
-
- Fairness is the issue here.
-
-
- --
-
- ###################################################################
- John Holt # Voice (513) 865-6821
- Mead Data Central, Inc. #
-