home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!stein.u.washington.edu!tzs
- From: tzs@stein.u.washington.edu (Tim Smith)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
- Subject: Re: FCC will proclaim Microsoft is run by Communists! : )
- Date: 3 Jan 1993 04:45:55 GMT
- Organization: University of Washington School of Law, Class of '95
- Lines: 23
- Message-ID: <1i5r23INNeee@shelley.u.washington.edu>
- References: <1i41ibINN78f@shelley.u.washington.edu> <1i4630INN6e@cs.tut.fi>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: stein.u.washington.edu
-
- (Kuusisto Pasi Petri,,,SIG,64380) writes:
- >> You actually saw an AT&T spokesman have an orgasm on a stage? I would expect
- >> that the speaker would have noticed that he was getting an erection and would
- > ^^^^^^^
- >
- >> have left in embarrasement before actually ejaculating in front of a bunch
- >> of people. Was he able to have this orgasm entirely on the basis of his
- >> talk, or did he have to rub against the podium? Was there much reaction
- >> from the audience? (I'm asking all these questions because someone literally
- >> having an orgasm in these circumatances is so unusual, I'm curious).
- >
- > You sure the spokesPERSON was a "he"? How come? Where's the evidence?
-
- Because it would be much harder to tell that a "she" was having an orgasm on
- stage. The original poster said that the person actually had an orgasm,
- and that would be almost impossible to tell with a woman, whereas a man
- creaming his pants on stage would be more obvious.
-
- If the original poster had said that they acted like they had an orgasm,
- then it would have been unreasonable to assume a man, but the original
- poster claimed that the person actually had an orgasm.
-
- --Tim Smith
-