home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!rpi!utcsri!geac!zooid!ron
- From: ron@zooid.guild.org (Secret Mud)
- Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
- Subject: Re: Beneficial Virus?
- Message-ID: <725811811.24290@zooid.guild.org>
- Date: 31 Dec 92 14:23:31 GMT
- Lines: 33
-
- From: rpowers@panix.com (Richard Powers)
- >In <725430469.26792@zooid.guild.org> ron@zooid.guild.org (Secret Mud) writes:
- >
- >>I doubt any virus could be beneficial. The closest idea for one was to have
- > ^^^
- >>one only erase edlin from MSDOS systems. In my mind, that would be fairly
- >>beneficial, but there are a few people who actually use it as a down'n'dirty
- >>editor.
- >[...]
- >
- >Quite a broad statement there. I came up with an idea (never
- >implemented BTW) for a file compression virus for use on my home
- >computer(s). Basically it would be a standard virus, but it would
- >compress a file it prepends itself to, so that upon execution
- >it would uncompress the file for normal execution. It would _only_
- >infect files that could benefit from compression. It would also check
- >for some file or other sort of marker on the system that the user
- >would have placed to give the virus permission to spread. Thus
- >keeping it from spreading to anyone who didn't want it around.
- >
- >Certainly a virus, and certainly beneficial. (Assuming it wasn't
- >buggy of course. :-) )
- >
-
- So your "beneficial" virus gets loose on my computer. And some time later, I
- want to, hmm, edit the icons in a Windows .exe. Or maybe I've got an ugly old
- program that modifies its exe so that it knows where it is. Crunch! The
- virus just got in the way--and if I didn't install the virus on my computer,
- I'm going to go looking for the owner.
-
- I don't think I'd trust even a controlled virus--it's too much of a kludgy
- technique. Why infect each program, when you could load an honest device
- driver?
-