home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ivgate!Wes.Perkhiser
- From: Wes.Perkhiser@ivgate.omahug.org (Wes Perkhiser)
- Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
- Subject: Compatability
- Message-ID: <29.2b41cccd@ivgate>
- Date: 28 Dec 92 09:39:15 CST
- Reply-To: wes.perkhiser@ivgate.omahug.org
- Organization:
- Sender: news@ivgate.omahug.org (UUscan 1.10)
- Followup-To: comp.org.eff.talk
- Lines: 67
-
- In a message of <Dec 28 03:48>, Bruce Hayden writes:
- BH>(From: bhayden@teal.csn.org (Bruce Hayden))
- BH>(Organization: Colorado SuperNet, Inc.)
-
- BH>charlie@umnstat.stat.umn.edu (Charles Geyer) writes:
-
- >In article <1992Dec22.034142.14471@fsl.noaa.gov> bear@kestrel.fsl.noaa.gov
- >(Bear Giles) asks:
-
- >> Or what if the software only had problems on really old systems which
- >> should have been upgraded a long time ago? ("Gee, I'm running DOS 2.8
- >> on a 5 MHz XT and your program doesn't seem to work!") How long do
- >> you need to keep providing upgrades for existing platforms?
-
- >A customer can't really complain if software doesn't work on hardware the
- >vendor doesn't claim it works on.
-
- BH>at least DOS 3.10, or Windows 3.1). My feeling is that if they
- BH>don't
- BH>tell me before I buy a piece of software (i.e. on the box) that
- BH>it
- BH>won't run on my machine, I expect it to run.
-
- One of the older (read it as consumer economics) ways I practice is a two-fold
- approach. If I plan on buying the software in the store, I look at the box for
-
- the specifics of hardware requirement. If it claims that it needs stuff I
- don't
- have, then it goes back on the shelf.
-
- If it doesn't claim to need anything (or I can't find the minimun configuration
-
- needed) then it also goes back on the shelf UNLESS I want it real, real bad.
- In
- that case, there is at least one store here in Omaha that will let you take
- back
- software after it has been opened, if you tell them your problems in advance.
- I
- get it there, and if it works on my machine, I keep it. If, after I've spent
- the bucks, and it still doesn't work, it goes back to the store.
-
- This sounds a lot like shareware, and I guess that's why I prefer shareware to
- "mainstream commercial software". I can try it, and don't lose anything (but
- my
- time) if it doesn't work.
-
- The other aproach deals with "junk mail". If the ad tells me what hardware I
- need, and if I have that setup, and if I wanted to buy it anyway, then they get
-
- the money. Most of the direct marketing people I have dealt with have been
- more
- than willing to work to get their product on my (archaic) platform. Those that
-
- don't, and those that claim "Runs on all computers, and gives any printer
- better
- resolution than a laser printer" get the big recycling bin in the sky.
- Ocasionaly, I'll get frustrated and send the marketer a nice letter, printed on
-
- my daisy wheel printer, asking what kind of graphics resolution I can expect.
- :)
-
-
- Wes (wes.perkhiser@weise.omahug.org)
-
- P.S. This quoted so much, I probably messed up the attributions. If so, I'm
- sorry.
-
-