home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!geac!zooid!ron
- From: ron@zooid.guild.org (Secret Mud)
- Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
- Subject: Re: Virus design
- Message-ID: <725430469.26792@zooid.guild.org>
- Date: 27 Dec 92 04:27:49 GMT
- Lines: 34
-
- From: rat@ruth.UUCP (David Douthitt)
- >I've just finished reading "Cyberpunk" (by Hafner & Markoff) recently and
- >read the story about rtm ...
- >
- >I read with interest about his writing a virus designed to be INNOCUOUS, and
- >I've also read other stories (such as an Apple II "virus" -- written before
- >viruses were both common and vicious). There have been numerous viruses
- >written in past years, either vicious and malicious and destructive, or
- >innocuous and harmless (in most cases)...
- >
- >Suppose someone wrote a virus that was BENEFICIAL? One that spread just
- >like others, but had a beneficial effect on the system. I can't think of
- >a better way to FIGHT viruses.... especially with people who won't check
- >their systems. The way viruses spread, this method would probably render
- >viruses obsolete in several years (presuming such an "antibody" was
- >updated.... and perhaps SELF-updating!)
- >
- > ...
-
- I doubt any virus could be beneficial. The closest idea for one was to have
- one only erase edlin from MSDOS systems. In my mind, that would be fairly
- beneficial, but there are a few people who actually use it as a down'n'dirty
- editor.
-
- What it boils down to is: my computer is MY computer. Any unauthorized
- programs are going to waste a lot of my time as I track them down and
- eradicate them.
-
- If anyone thinks they have a beneficial virus, they only need sign their name
- to it, and add a remark that they take full legal responsibility for any
- problems it creates on any and all platforms. (It would also be helpful if
- they had a few million dollars in the bank to make sueing them worthwhile.)
-
- - Ron Sharp.
-