home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!mnemonic
- From: mnemonic@eff.org (Mike Godwin)
- Subject: Re: WELL anonymity policy
- Message-ID: <1992Dec23.152701.25676@eff.org>
- Originator: mnemonic@eff.org
- Sender: usenet@eff.org (NNTP News Poster)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: eff.org
- Organization: Electronic Frontier Foundation
- References: <1h7j0eINNs02@agate.berkeley.edu> <1992Dec23.023944.19968@eff.org> <1h995rINNb1h@agate.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 15:27:01 GMT
- Lines: 30
-
- In article <1h995rINNb1h@agate.berkeley.edu> spp@zabriskie.berkeley.edu (Steve Pope) writes:
-
- >Mike, I talked to quite a few people involved with the WELL
- >before starting this thread.
-
- Perhaps, but you don't seem to have talked to anyone who ran into any
- genuine disagreement with WELL management about its anonymity policy.
-
- > Why are you so quick to label
- >any information so gathered as "speculation", while proposing
- >that additional information gathered by the exact same technique
- >might somehow be more reliable?
-
- I wasn't talking about "the exact same technique." I was talking about
- *using* the WELL and finding out for yourself whether its anonymity
- policies create problems or complaints. The only data you seem to have are
- based on a speculative reading of one sentence of the WELL's membership
- policy. You are talking about a problem that doesn't seem to exist.
-
-
- --Mike
-
-
-
-
- --
- Mike Godwin, |"I'm waiting for the one-man revolution
- mnemonic@eff.org| The only one that's coming."
- (617) 864-0665 |
- EFF, Cambridge | --Robert Frost
-