home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!dsinc!cs.widener.edu!eff!mnemonic
- From: mnemonic@eff.org (Mike Godwin)
- Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
- Subject: Re: WELL anonymity policy
- Message-ID: <1992Dec23.023944.19968@eff.org>
- Date: 23 Dec 92 02:39:44 GMT
- References: <1h66qsINNn1v@agate.berkeley.edu> <1992Dec22.170211.10292@eff.org> <1h7j0eINNs02@agate.berkeley.edu>
- Sender: usenet@eff.org (NNTP News Poster)
- Distribution: inet
- Organization: Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Lines: 30
- Originator: mnemonic@eff.org
- Nntp-Posting-Host: eff.org
-
- In article <1h7j0eINNs02@agate.berkeley.edu> spp@zabriskie.berkeley.edu (Steve Pope) writes:
-
- >When a new user signs up for the well he is told:
- >
- >> The WELL does not accept anonymous accounts except by special
- >> arrangement.
- >
- >There are essentially two possibilities:
-
- <text deleted>
-
- Rather than speculate about the possibilities, why not take the empirical
- approach. I'd prefer to hear from people who actually had problems with
- the WELL (a system I use every day) than from folks who *speculate* that
- there *might* be problems with its user policies.
-
- This thread doesn't seem to have any connection with the WELL as it
- actually operates.
-
-
- --Mike
-
-
-
-
- --
- Mike Godwin, |"I'm waiting for the one-man revolution
- mnemonic@eff.org| The only one that's coming."
- (617) 864-0665 |
- EFF, Cambridge | --Robert Frost
-