home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.arch
- Path: sparky!uunet!math.fu-berlin.de!uni-paderborn.de!urmel.informatik.rwth-aachen.de!Germany.EU.net!incom!orfeo!qb!vhs
- From: vhs@rhein-main.de (Volker Herminghaus-Shirai)
- Subject: Re: Def of a workstation (a lark)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan3.235327.13718@qb.rhein-main.de>
- Sender: vhs@qb.rhein-main.de (Volker Herminghaus-Shirai)
- Reply-To: vhs@rhein-main.de
- References: <1993Jan3.052930.27869@wam.umd.edu>
- Date: Sun, 3 Jan 93 23:53:27 GMT
- Lines: 58
-
- In article <1993Jan3.052930.27869@wam.umd.edu> rsrodger@wam.umd.edu (Yamanari)
- writes:
- > We all spend time with strange people for New Years..
- >
- > So I'm trying to explain to a friend who has just bought a
- > new Gateway system (dx2-66, lb ATI ultra @ 1024x768, running
- > ' OS/2) what a workstation is (he asked, because I was discussing
- > the schools computer lab and used the word), and, well..
- >
- > Can anyone give me a definition of workstation, other than
- > cost, that seperates it from modern high-end PC systems (in his
- > case, one that cost no more than $3500).
- >
- > At first I was tempted to talk about UNIX or RISC, but these
- > were less than satisfactory (UNIX because he could be running
- > UNIX, and RISC sounds deficient--those old M68k based Suns are
- > still workstations...and then there's the 386i...)..
- >
- > Anyone? Come to think of it, it's pretty muddled to me, too.
-
- The high lowest common denominator. Workstation software relies
- on stuff like TCP/IP suppport, the UNIX tool set, multiuser/multitasking
- OS, high resolution screens, mouse, etc. The lowest common denominator
- for a PC is still an 8088 with MDA and 512K (realistically).
- You won't find software that's written for and
- really takes advantage of the resources of high-end PCs, even if that's
- what the vendors want to make you think. E.g. M$-Windoze's incredibly
- clumsy mouseless mode (since they can't rely on everyone having a mouse)
- that shines through the mouseful mode, clumsifying the latter, too.
- (Additional menu items for move, resize, etc that are useless if you have
- a mouse since no one in his sane mind would use them then.)
- The video-mode desaster is another example. I have yet to see a workstation
- that keeps switching between "text-mode" and a horrendous amount of
- "graphics-modes" (except for the RS6000, which does text/graphics mode. Sigh.
- A decent workstation has IMHO *at least* the following items of which the
- software can and does take advantage of:
- a high-resolution screen
- a pointing device
- an ethernet connection (or token ring if your management was bribed ;-)
- a UN*X operating system with TCP/IP support and a C compiler
- a boot prom that allows for interactive diagnosis etc.
- a decent amount of RAM and hard disk space
- a tape drive for backups and data exchange as opposed to floppy disk
- other items I may have forgotten (it's already tomorrow...;-)
-
- Software writers are usually driven to write for the lowest reasonable
- common denominator, so if any of the above items don't exist in the base
- configuration of a workstation line, forget at least 50% of their usefulness
- if you have them. (E.g. >50 AIX or SCO UNIX installation disks vs. one tape.
- Newer releases may give you one or two floppies and a tape, but still no
- delivery on CD-ROM, as far as I see. Also no installing via ethernet, since
- not everybody has it, etc.)
-
- --
- Volker Herminghaus-Shirai (vhs@qb.rhein-main.de), NeXTmail welcome
-
- Looks good on the outside, but -
- intel inside
-