home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
- Path: sparky!uunet!hobbes!md
- From: md@sco.COM (Michael Davidson)
- Subject: Re: Performace degradation under SCO
- Organization: The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc.
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 19:07:52 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Dec22.190752.14569@sco.com>
- References: <9212221719.AA03629@kbvan.COM>
- Sender: news@sco.com (News admin)
- Lines: 30
-
-
- kbvan!dave@uunet.UU.NET (Dave Van Allen) writes:
-
-
- >> In article <1472@pacsoft.com> mike@pacsoft.com (Mike Stefanik) writes:
- >> >This posting is on behalf of a friend of mine who is having a problem
- >> >with an SCO UNIX upgrade. A customer of his originally had a 486/33
- >> >with 16M of memory and a 1G SCSI drive. Recently, the system was upgraded
- >> >to a 486/50 with 32M of memory and an additional 1G drive was added. The
- >>
- >> >is now crawling along at a snail's pace.
- >>
-
- >The problem may not be related to kernel parameters at all. Many ISA bus
- >motherboards will exhibit major speed degradation when you go past 16 MB
- >of main store.
-
- >The reason, simplified, is that the ISA bus has 24 address lines for doing
- >memory access, which means it can only directly address 16MB. After that,
- >when UNIX tries to do DMA, it must copy down or page memory chunks to a
- >space below 16 MB. This is very slow. Some MB manufactures have worked
- >around this but for the most part, my experience has been that stock and
- >standard MB's ( read; the ones that work right) will have this limitation.
-
- There is another factor that may be contributing to this problem.
- Depending on the architecture and size of the secondary cache it
- may or may not be caching memory accesses above 16 Meg. There are
- a lot of motherboards that are sold with cache configurations that
- will not cache above 16 Meg - this will have a very serious affect
- on performance.
-