home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!NETXWEST.COM!JFISHER
- X-Delivery-Notice: SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
- Message-ID: <9212301650.AA00610@wizard.netx.com>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
- Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 08:50:00 PST
- Sender: Forum for the Discussion of Politics <POLITICS@UCF1VM.BITNET>
- From: Jonathan Fisher <jfisher@NETXWEST.COM>
- Subject: Re: nambla
- Comments: To: POLITICS@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu
- Lines: 38
-
- > Jonathan:
- >
- > >Please explain to me how one could have sex with children but
- > >not be molesting them.
- >
- > I never said anything about having sex with children. I said
- > 'loving them', meaning being attracted to them.
- >
- > Sam.
- >
-
- Sam,
- Below is the part that you decided to cut. It is pretty obvious to
- me why you decided to cut it, but maybe you can explain it.
-
- ----- Begin Included Message -----
- > I think it's unfair to mention NAMBLA in a company of unsavory groups.
- > I believe that there is nothing wrong about loving children (that's
- > all NAMBLA is about). It is wrong to molest children, but not to love
- > them, even sexually. NAMBLA is created as a support group for people
- > who are attracted to children. It is not a cabal of child molesters.
- >
- > Sam.
- >
- I don't know about the rest of you, but this whole paragraph is a
- mass of contradictions to me. Please explain to me how one could
- have sex with children but not be molesting them.
-
- Jonathan
-
-
- ----- End Included Message -----
-
- If you'll note the third sentence, you say specifically that you don`t
- find anything wrong with having sex with children. Now do you wish to
- deny your statement again?
-
- Jonathan
-