home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / bit / listserv / politics / 20744 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-12-30  |  1.2 KB  |  28 lines
  1. Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!ADMINB.RFERL.ORG!BADERTINOVS
  3. X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
  4. X-VMS-To: ADMINB::NEWS::IN%"POLITICS@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu"
  5. X-VMS-Cc: BADERTINOVS
  6. MIME-version: 1.0
  7. Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
  8. Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
  9. Message-ID: <01GSXLX7DPLE8WWZ5H@MUVAXJ.RFERL.ORG>
  10. Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
  11. Date:         Wed, 30 Dec 1992 16:33:08 +0100
  12. Sender:       Forum for the Discussion of Politics <POLITICS@UCF1VM.BITNET>
  13. From:         BADERTINOVS%NEWS@ADMINB.RFERL.ORG
  14. Subject:      Re: gay cabinet appointments
  15. Comments: To: POLITICS@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu
  16. Lines: 10
  17.  
  18. --KAT,
  19.  
  20. I agree with you. It is better to appoint people who are SYMPATHETIC
  21. towards gays than appointing gays. Some gays, especially the closeted
  22. ones, can be more anti-gays than some of the straight homophobes.
  23. That is one of the reasons why the magazine "Advocate" started the
  24. practice of "outing" closeted gays. I don't agree with that policy
  25. but I can see why they want to do that.
  26.  
  27. Sam.
  28.