home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!IRLEARN.UCD.IE!BRIDEC92
- X-Acknowledge-To: <BRIDEC92@IRLEARN.UCD.IE>
- Message-ID: <POLITICS%92122309350026@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 14:35:54 GMT
- Sender: Forum for the Discussion of Politics <POLITICS@UCF1VM.BITNET>
- From: james p mcbride <BRIDEC92@IRLEARN.UCD.IE>
- Subject: Re: re:re: freedom of speech
- In-Reply-To: Message of Wed,
- 23 Dec 1992 07:40:44 CST from <U9AA@SDSUMUS.SDSTATE.EDU>
- Lines: 30
-
- On Wed, 23 Dec 1992 07:40:44 CST rufus t. firefly said:
- >
- >> Let's have a contest.
- >>
- >> Who can be MORE in favor of freedom of speech for those with whom
- >> you disagree?
- >>
- >> I'll go first. (oops, too late for that.)
- >>
- >> I am in favor of freedom of speech for Nazis, Stalinists, cat-torturers,
- >> Rush Limbaugh, fast food restaurants, Freudians, Libertarians,
- >> Alabamans, and every other odious ideologue I can think of.
- >>
- >> Wow. Controversial, huh?
- >>
- >> Jamie
- >>
- >
- > i'm in favor of freedom of speech for all of the above, plus nambla,
- >holocaust revisionists, and straight white republican males. so there.
- >
- >rtf
-
- I'm in favour of freedom of spelling for all of those, plus people who
- spell color, favor, etc, with a 'u', ie, colour, favour, labour, etc.
-
- top that
-
-
- james
-