home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!II.UJ.EDU.PL!CAIUS
- X-Delivery-Notice: SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
- X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL8]
- Message-ID: <9212211420.AA12765@infoserv.ii.uj.edu.pl>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 15:20:03 MET
- Sender: Forum for the Discussion of Politics <POLITICS@UCF1VM.BITNET>
- From: Grzegorz Albinowski <caius@II.UJ.EDU.PL>
- Subject: human percentage
- Comments: To: Politics Disc List <POLITICS@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu>
- Lines: 20
-
- >Subject: Re: 70% Human
-
- > I don't think I fully follow everything in your post about percentages
- > and humans etc...all I can say is you misunderstood the point of my post
- > and went off on my sarcasm...
-
- I am sorry. English is not my mother tongue.
-
-
- I consider women to be better sort of humans. No less that 199.75 %.
- Your subject line was an underestimation.
-
- Do you think you are "better human" if you earn more?
- Do you think that humanity is measured by your income?
-
- > Equal pay for equal work. Period.
- > -T.
-
- Equal pay for equal effect.
- Caius.
-