home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UABDPO.BITNET!ISTS024
- Message-ID: <ALLMUSIC%92122308581166@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.allmusic
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 07:53:04 CST
- Sender: Discussions on all forms of Music <ALLMUSIC@AUVM.BITNET>
- From: Leonard Watkins <ISTS024@UABDPO.BITNET>
- Subject: Re: piss metal
- In-Reply-To: Message of Tue, 22 Dec 1992 17:01:20 EST from <ST402711@BROWNVM>
- Lines: 12
-
- On Tue, 22 Dec 1992 17:01:20 EST Tim Johnson said:
- >I understood Len's question to be why people get a burr
- >up their butt over one but not the other, with the implication
- >being that it is hypocritical. I think there is no hypocrisy,
- >and no problem - if you are easily offended, go for it. Just
- >don't expect us all to agree or even sympathize with you. I
- >gave a rationale for the difference in concern over piss christ
- >and piss malcom. Work yourself up over whichever you please.
-
- I don't really care what an artist does, i object to gov't funding for stuff
- that is not art....pure and simple Mapplethorpe's work is not art a bottle of
- piss is not art......it's not art...........L.W.
-