home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: sam@hpsad.sad.hp.com (Vicky Hansen)
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 18:12:52 GMT
- Subject: Re: Okay, what *is* that view? (was: Re: Pre-Sex Contract)
- Message-ID: <2450051@hpsad.sad.hp.com>
- Organization: HP Signal Analysis Division - Rohnert Park, CA
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!col.hp.com!news.dtc.hp.com!hpscit.sc.hp.com!hplextra!hpl-opus!hpnmdla!hpsad!sam
- Newsgroups: ba.singles
- References: <1992Dec8.163105.17345@amd.com>
- Lines: 12
-
- In ba.singles, charleen@net.bio.net (Charleen Bunjiovianna) writes:
-
- I think that interest in sex manifests itself in many different ways,
- and that women have quiet ways of indulging in lust (hey, bun-watching
- is one of *my* favorite activities), and men's ways tend to be more
- vocal or obvious. And with men, there's the whole if-I'm-not-obsessed-
- with-sex-I'm-not-a-Real-Man worry. Yes, I have actually known men
- who worried that people would think them less than macho if they didn't
- display an active interest in the opposite sex.
-
- The 'problem' goes the other way too. "Nympho" is not usually a term used
- as a postivie discriptor of a lady.
-