home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sun-barr!olivea!gossip.pyramid.com!pyramid!glambert
- From: glambert@pyramid.com (George Lambert)
- Newsgroups: ba.politics
- Subject: Re: What DO they teach in kindergarten nowadays?
- Message-ID: <184723@pyramid.pyramid.com>
- Date: 29 Dec 92 18:45:50 GMT
- References: <1992Dec23.061442.14107@netcom.com> <1h9309INNofi@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> <1992Dec23.110137.19406@netcom.com>
- Sender: news@pyramid.pyramid.com
- Organization: Pyramid Technology
- Lines: 33
-
- In article <1992Dec23.110137.19406@netcom.com> phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone) writes:
- >In article <1h9309INNofi@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> stephen@orchid.UCSC.EDU (x4604 (Hauskins)) writes:
- > >So can you document the opposite? Show us proof that this is
- > >one of the few (if not the first) time you ever have admitted
- > >to being wrong about something. You always document- with at
- > >least one source, that is not sufficient for many of the
- > >arguments you make.
- >
- >This is really a gem. OK, here is the proof of all the times, other
- >than Maddi's recent little correcto-gasm, that I've been wrong:
- >
- > " "
- >
- >I can't believe how stupid you are in public.
- >
- Phil, you are indeed a jerk, and one with an extremely short memory. When I
- had more time, I used to take special enjoyment in proving how wrong you
- were. If I had more time, I could continue to pick you apart. The last time
- around was with your '5 for 5' post, in which I pointed out to you that you
- weren't all that brilliant there, either.
-
- You're still remarkably stupid and inconsistent. Last year, you were knocking
- Scientific American, this year I noted you using it as a reference source.
-
- If you really were worth anything (you're not), I could spend a little time
- berating you and your fears of PC, Nazis, and whatever your dark little mind
- conjures up.
-
- I don't need to, though...others here are doing a fine job.
-
- Happy Holidays
-
- George Lambert
-