home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: ba.politics
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!phil
- From: phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone)
- Subject: What DO they teach in kindergarten nowadays?
- Message-ID: <1992Dec23.110137.19406@netcom.com>
- Organization: Generally in favor of, but mostly random.
- References: <1992Dec22.212718.29965@netcom.com> <1992Dec23.061442.14107@netcom.com> <1h9309INNofi@darkstar.UCSC.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 11:01:37 GMT
- Lines: 22
-
- In article <1h9309INNofi@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> stephen@orchid.UCSC.EDU (x4604 (Hauskins)) writes:
- >So can you document the opposite? Show us proof that this is
- >one of the few (if not the first) time you ever have admitted
- >to being wrong about something. You always document- with at
- >least one source, that is not sufficient for many of the
- >arguments you make.
-
- This is really a gem. OK, here is the proof of all the times, other
- than Maddi's recent little correcto-gasm, that I've been wrong:
-
- " "
-
- I can't believe how stupid you are in public.
-
- And, BTW, one documented source for what I believe is better than zero.
-
-
-
- --
- I believe Gennifer Flowers.
-
- These opinions are MINE, and you can't have 'em! (But I'll rent 'em cheap ...)
-