home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!darkstar.UCSC.EDU!orchid.UCSC.EDU!stephen
- From: stephen@orchid.UCSC.EDU (x4604 (Hauskins))
- Newsgroups: ba.politics
- Subject: Re: Gays, the military and "privacy"
- Date: 23 Dec 1992 07:09:48 GMT
- Organization: Santa Cruz
- Lines: 24
- Message-ID: <1h93bsINNofp@darkstar.UCSC.EDU>
- References: <92357.48577.J056600@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM> <1992Dec23.063048.15348@netcom.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: orchid.ucsc.edu
-
- In article <1992Dec23.063048.15348@netcom.com> phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone) writes:
- >In article <92357.48577.J056600@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM> J056600@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM writes:
- > >And how is "Go to the back of the bus, nigger" much different
- > >than "Get the hell out of the Army, you faggot?"
- >
- >So therefore, you disapprove of seperate but equal facilities (bunk rooms,
- >showers and such) for women. They just be racist artifacts.
- >
-
- As usual you run off and avoid the main argument. You must use tangential
- approaches in order to make yourself look valid. Get off of the women
- issue and get back to issue. And the issue simply is 'should gay people
- in the military, but expelled when found out or admitting they are gay?"
-
- Is the male so weak that he fears someone might be watching him, or
- might see his ??????.
-
- >
- >--
- >I believe Gennifer Flowers.
- >
-
- And I sure she enjoyed every minute of it, don't you?
-
-