home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!wupost!gumby!yale!admiral!dave
- From: dave@admiral.uucp (Dave Litchman)
- Subject: Re: Baby talk translator
- Organization: The Admiral's Unix System & The Grid BBS
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 11:00:09 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Dec22.110009.4647@admiral.uucp>
- References: <1992Dec20.184942.1748@cc.umontreal.ca>
- Lines: 30
-
- In article <1992Dec20.184942.1748@cc.umontreal.ca> dufortm@JSP.UMontreal.CA (Dufort Michel) writes:
- >
- > It is know that when then automobile was invented, we tought
- > that it was an invention worth to be used by everybody. But
- > now it's a major poluant and has become an other big society
- > problem. Altough the intension in building the automobile was
- > a good one right?
- >
- > How about the baby stranslator? Would it's devellopement do
- > any dammage to the education of the baby and young children?
- > I mean the intention is good but would people get the habit
- > to use the baby transator rather than teaching the children
- > to "talk realy"?
- >
- > This is not for homework. I'm just suggesting this as a new
- > topic for the newsgroup.
- >
- > Mike
-
- What a deep, thoughtful, and probing question, Mike.
-
- I think the answer goes a little something like this:
-
- It's just a cartoon.
-
-
- --
- "Dammit Jim, I'm a free man, not a number!"
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- "Ray, when somebody asks you if you're a god, you say YES!" -- Winston Zeddmore
-