home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!husc-news.harvard.edu!husc.harvard.edu!mcirvin
- Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.new-theories
- Subject: Re: In defense of crackpots ( was Re: Repost of Truzzi Lecture: )
- Message-ID: <mcirvin.725830658@husc.harvard.edu>
- From: mcirvin@husc8.harvard.edu (Matt McIrvin)
- Date: 31 Dec 92 19:37:38 GMT
- References: <1992Dec23.003135.20240@netcom.com> <1hk78vINN34t@gap.caltech.edu>
- <C03HC5.98n@fs7.ece.cmu.edu> <6774@tuegate.tue.nl> <1992Dec31.160730.393@mail.cornell.edu>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: husc8.harvard.edu
- Lines: 24
-
- phydeaux@guru.med.cornell.edu (Dave Weingart) writes:
-
- >In article <6774@tuegate.tue.nl>, wsadjw@rw7.urc.tue.nl (Jan Willem Nienhuys) writes:
- >|> Einstein. Special relativity was thought to be ridiculous by people
- >|> who didn't know too much about about physics. How long did it take
-
- >It was also thought ridiculous by physicists. Science is by it's nature conservative.
-
- It was thought implausible by some physicists of the time, and recognized
- almost immediately by others as elegant and capable of explaining much.
- Remember, for one thing, that Einstein's role in SR was largely that of
- a unifier who put into one framework things that were being done by
- Lorentz, Fitzgerald, Poincare, and others; the seed of it had been
- about ever since Maxwell identified c as a characteristic speed in
- electromagnetism, denying Galilean relativity. The most vehement and long-
- lived critiques of Einstein came from places where free intellectual
- discourse was being stifled by oppressive political ideologies, such as
- Nazi Germany and Stalin's USSR.
-
- In 1905 Einstein was something of an outsider, but he wasn't generally
- considered a crackpot.
- --
- Matt McIrvin I read Usenet just for the tab damage!
- ==== ======= = ==== ====== ==== === === === =======
-