home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.romance:15637 alt.romance.chat:22729
- Newsgroups: alt.romance,alt.romance.chat
- Path: sparky!uunet!sequent!muncher.sequent.com!rip
- From: rip@sequent.com (Paul T Taylor)
- Subject: Re: Equality between men and women; is there such a thing?
- Message-ID: <1993Jan3.234211.5805@sequent.com>
- Sender: usenet@sequent.com (usenet )
- Nntp-Posting-Host: sequent.sequent.com
- Organization: Sequent Computer Systems, Inc.
- References: <1993Jan3.012253.22642@mercury.cair.du.edu> <1i5p7hINNdcn@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>
- Date: Sun, 3 Jan 93 23:42:11 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <1i5p7hINNdcn@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> ci022@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Richard Kirby) writes:
- >
- >In a previous article, charon@zephyr.cair.du.edu (Spaz) says:
- >
- >>
- >>Equality between men and women. Equality straight across the board. Not
- >>Equal when it suits a purpose, Not Equal just when it's convenient, but
- >>Equality at ALL times be it good, or bad. Knowing this, do you still
- >>wish to be equal?
- >>
- >
- >Since this is alt.romance.* I assume you refer to equality between
- >my SO and me. Which of course has little or nothing to do with
- >equality in the workplace, battlefield, etc.
- >
- >No. I want her to be better than me at her hobbies and career.
- >And I want to be better at my hobbies and career. This is not
- >equality. This is balence.
- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-
- Good point, wish I had thought of it!
-
- rip
- --
- While having never invented a sin, I'm trying to perfect several.
-