home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!uum1!digiboard!digibd!merlyn
- From: merlyn@digibd.digibd.com (Merlyn LeRoy)
- Newsgroups: alt.politics.correct
- Subject: Re: women marines/in military
- Message-ID: <merlyn.725087174@digibd>
- Date: 23 Dec 92 05:06:14 GMT
- References: <merlyn.724047346@digibd> <85354@ut-emx.uucp> <merlyn.724385740@digibd> <85578@ut-emx.uucp> <merlyn.724785303@digibd> <1992Dec21.005140.16055@mtek.com> <merlyn.724996322@digibd> <1992Dec22.173755.16285@mtek.com>
- Sender: news@digiboard.digibd.com (USENET News)
- Distribution: usa
- Organization: DigiBoard, Incorporated, Eden Prairie,MN
- Lines: 27
- Nntp-Posting-Host: digibd.digibd.com
-
- bud@mtek.com (Bud Hovell) writes:
-
- >merlyn@digibd.digibd.com (Merlyn LeRoy) writes:
-
- >>bud@mtek.com (Bud Hovell) writes:
-
- >>>merlyn@digibd.digibd.com (Merlyn LeRoy) writes:
-
- >>>>Like I said, rationalizations, not reasons. Doing things solely for
- >>>>'tradition' means doing things today because you did them that way
- >>>>yesterday.
-
- >>>Much like your postings.
-
- >>Ah, yes, the old ad homenim "argument". Got any real ones?
-
- >It wasn't an argument. It was an observation that you were becoming
- >repetitive in your assertion. I believe this is a matter of fact.
- >Unless you are prepared to debate whether this is so, there is no
- >basis for argument, save among fools.
-
- Hey, I'm trying, but *you* certainly haven't offered any reasons
- on why men & women in the military have to follow different
- standards on hair length.
-
- ---
- Merlyn LeRoy
-