home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.folklore.urban:32249 rec.arts.startrek.misc:13098 talk.bizarre:43091
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!concert!duke!news.duke.edu!panda.mc.duke.edu
- From: klg@panda.mc.duke.edu (Kim Greer -- rjj)
- Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban,rec.arts.startrek.misc,talk.bizarre
- Subject: Re: Walking Between Rain Drops !!!!
- Message-ID: <8269@news.duke.edu>
- Date: 29 Dec 92 19:29:23 GMT
- References: <1992Dec22.193935.570236@locus.com> <1992Dec22.230324.2035@news.columbia.edu> <1992Dec23.163626.575594@locus.com>
- Sender: news@news.duke.edu
- Followup-To: alt.folklore.urban
- Distribution: usa
- Organization: Duke University, Nuclear Medicine
- Lines: 27
- Nntp-Posting-Host: panda.mc.duke.edu
-
- In article <1992Dec23.163626.575594@locus.com> dwight@locus.com writes:
-
- >|> for those on the net that waste bandwidth
-
- >If you look at most of the postings in AFU, you will see that there is no such thing as a
- >"waste of bandwidth" here.
- >
- > Dwight Tovey
-
- While we're on the subject, is this business about "wasting net bandwidth"
- an UL in itself,anymore? Is there someone who can document that somehow AFU
- (or any other) postings are preventing "real and serious" work from getting
- done? (I'm talking about the net in general, not isolated, specific sites
- using 300/1200 baud modems for connectivity.) Though many would disagree,
- getting 99% or 80% or 40% or even 20% of every available newgroup is
- probably overkill, which means that a lot of groups would/could be done
- without, without missing the benefits of truely useful (to work, study,
- whatever) posts.
-
- kg
-
-
- --
- Kim L. Greer
- Duke University Medical Center klg@orion.mc.duke.edu
- Div. Nuclear Medicine POB 3949 voice: 919-681-5894
- Durham, NC 27710 fax: 919-681-5636
-