home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!apollo.hp.com!cupnews0.cup.hp.com!news1.boi.hp.com!hp-pcd!hpcvaac!billn
- From: billn@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill nelson)
- Subject: Re: Trademarks (was Re: ...film at 11...)
- Message-ID: <1992Dec22.194932.1349@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com>
- Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company, Corvallis, Oregon USA
- References: <Bzn1n3.Jxp@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu>
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 19:49:32 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
- norlin@midway.ecn.uoknor.edu (Norman Lin) writes:
- :
- : : There is no way to
- : : trademark a commonly used term. For example, Bayer lost their "aspirin"
- : : trademank due to common usage.
- :
- : Is that right? Well, I have a can of Lipton Iced Tea (bought out of the
- : coke machine), and it says:
- :
- : "Brisk (tm) Iced Tea"
- :
- : which seems to imply they have a trademark on (of all things) the word
- : "Brisk." Ludicrous, yes, but there is the "tm" subscripted right below
- : the word "Brisk" and before the word "Iced." Bizarre.
-
- Hm. Must be context sensitive. For example, if I said "I think I will go
- for a Brisk walk!", Lipton could not sue me for violation of trademark.
-
- The reason Bayer lost their trademark, was that aspirin came to be a
- generic term for over-the-counter painkillers, so they could not limit
- the usage to a particular brand of analgesic.
-
- Bill
-