home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!tennyson.lbl.gov!twcaps
- From: twcaps@tennyson.lbl.gov (Terry Chan)
- Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
- Subject: Trademarks
- Date: 22 Dec 1992 06:13:38 GMT
- Organization: Department of Redundancy Department
- Lines: 27
- Message-ID: <28107@dog.ee.lbl.gov>
- References: <8ma3VB1w165w@codewks.nacjack.gen.nz> <1992Dec21.215401.7781@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com>
- Reply-To: TWChan@lbl.gov (Terry Chan)
- NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.12.117
-
- infidel@cislabs.pitt.edu (todd j. derr) writes:
-
- +: > I haven't been this steamed since the last time a megacorp highjacked
- +: > a common term, when IBM (in my mind, illegally) trademarked the
- +: > acronym for "personal computer."
-
- billn@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill nelson) writes:
-
- +Nope. Todd is either trolling, or very confused. There is no way to
- +trademark a commonly used term. For example, Bayer lost their "aspirin"
- +trademank due to common usage.
-
- Indeed. A perusal of the November 30, 1992 _PC Week_ shows
- several ads referring to IBM personal computers. The first,
- on pp. 64-65 talks about the new IBM series which is called
- "PS/ValuePoint". The IBM trademarks in that article include
- "IBM", "OS/2", "PS/2", "PS/ValuePoint", "ThinkPad", "HelpWare",
- and "386/SLC"." Further, there is a Gateway 2000 ad on pp. 132
- and 133 and a Microsoft ad (not to mention the name of the
- publication itself) which uses the acronym without any recognition
- of IBM's "trademark."
-
- Terry [tm] Chan
- --
- Energy and Environment Division | Internet: TWChan@lbl.gov
- Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory |
- Berkeley, California USA 94720 | Carpe per diem
-