home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!b50-afrd4.lbl.gov!user
- From: JTCHEW@lbl.gov (Ad absurdum per aspera)
- Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
- Subject: Re: Why care what percentage? (was: Gay Likelihood)
- Followup-To: alt.folklore.urban
- Date: 21 Dec 1992 14:59:57 GMT
- Organization: Honest Ernie's Used Ions
- Lines: 26
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <JTCHEW-211292065104@b50-afrd4.lbl.gov>
- References: <28010@dog.ee.lbl.gov> <JTCHEW-181292074518@b50-afrd4.lbl.gov> <BzJ0nJ.1Ip7@austin.ibm.com> <1992Dec21.084939.19583@netcom.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.252.152
-
- In article <1992Dec21.084939.19583@netcom.com>, obrien@netcom.com (Robert
- O'Brien) wrote:
-
- > What I'm wondering is, does it make a difference to you? If, say, 2% of
- > the population is all, then would that excuse ignoring or discriminating
- > against a group? If 20% of the population were gay, then they'd be
- > a lot harder to ignore eh?
-
- Well... that's *my* point, kind of, in explaining why the number seems
- to have taken on some political importance. A homophobe isn't
- forced to confront his prejudices if he thinks there are 1 or 2 gay people
- in 100. There are surely 1 or 2 people in 100 he doesn't like anyway,
- and in whom he can see "effeminate" or at least off-normal characteristics
- if he looks creatively enough. If the proportion is widely assumed to be
-
- 10% or 20%, though, he has to confront the idea that there might be a
- homosexual in the room with him right now -- maybe even someone he
- likes and probably someone who "doesn't look gay."
-
- That may be less than the ideal motivation for confronting fear of
- homosexuals, but it's better than nothing. And it doesn't take a
- folklorist of Brunvandian proportions to see how this motivation would help
- a possibly bogus number take on a life of its own.
-
- Joe
- "Just another personal opinion from the People's Republic of Berkeley"
-