home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!obrien
- From: obrien@netcom.com (Robert O'Brien)
- Subject: Why care what percentage? (was: Gay Likelihood)
- Message-ID: <1992Dec21.084939.19583@netcom.com>
- Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
- References: <28010@dog.ee.lbl.gov> <JTCHEW-181292074518@b50-afrd4.lbl.gov> <BzJ0nJ.1Ip7@austin.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 08:49:39 GMT
- Lines: 39
-
- In article <BzJ0nJ.1Ip7@austin.ibm.com> jlpicard@austin.ibm.com writes:
- >
- >JTCHEW@lbl.gov (Ad absurdum per aspera) writes:
- >...
- >> I've always heard it as common knowledge that "10% of the population
- >> is gay." It may not be true, and I don't know what the origin of the
- >> belief might be (probably some combination of the Kinsey and Masters
- >> and Johnson research and the derivatives thereof), but I'd say it is
- >> very widely held in the US.
- >
- >Who cares about real life? What I'd like to know is what percentage of
- >the _net_ is gay.
- >
-
- What I'm wondering is, does it make a difference to you? If, say, 2% of
- the population is all, then would that excuse ignoring or discriminating
- against a group? If 20% of the population were gay, then they'd be
- a lot harder to ignore eh? I'm sure some people are just curious, which
- is fine, but I worry that many of those who care about the proportion
- of some minority within the population care because they'd have a different
- level of respect based on that proportion - flawed reasoning, in my mind.
-
-
- I've read many times that 12% of the population is left-handed, and you
- can bet there's discrimination still present, though most of it is
- unintended. If we were only 1%, there'd be people wanting to eliminate
- us. If we were 50%, most people would begin to understand it's just a
- difference. Not better not worse, not more, not less, just different.
-
- I got this out of someone's .sig:
- "If all mankind minus one were of one opinion, and only one person
- were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified
- in silencing that one person than he, if he had the power, would
- be justified in silencing mankind."
- -John Stuart Mill
- A
-
- Bob "some think me left-handed, but I'm really ambisinistral" O'Brien
- --
-