home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.fishing:3214 rec.outdoors.fishing:1541
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!wupost!waikato.ac.nz!comp.vuw.ac.nz!newshost.wcc.govt.nz!kosmos.wcc.govt.nz!KENEALY_D
- Newsgroups: alt.fishing,rec.outdoors.fishing
- Subject: Re: Planted vs. natives
- Message-ID: <1hosr6INN1l0@golem.wcc.govt.nz>
- From: kenealy_d@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz
- Date: 29 Dec 1992 06:56:38 GMT
- Reply-To: kenealy_d@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz
- References: <1992Dec28.070226.9719@nevada.edu>
- Organization: Wellington City Council (Public Access), Wgtn, Nz
- NNTP-Posting-Host: kosmos.wcc.govt.nz
- Lines: 10
-
-
- >I have a quick question. It's not really overly important to life, but it's
-
- >now considered natives or are they considered planted?
-
- They are considered "introduced". Native = ALWAYS been there which for trout is
- hardly ever.
-
- David Kenealy from New Zealand - the world's best (and cheapest) trout fishery
-
-